Template candidates
Click Select on anything you like. The selected IDs stay in the bottom panel so you can send them back as a short list.
Dark split layout with KPI rail and consultation CTA.
Start with a business diagnosis, then build only what actually changes revenue, time, or stability.
Centered serif hero for credibility-first service pages.
No ready-made packages. First we understand where leads, margin, time, or calm are leaking.
Bold asymmetry, hard shadows, energetic CTA area.
CRM, AI, automations, monitoring and websites are selected only after the business problem is clear.
Maximum clarity and scanning, large type, minimal effects.
After the first conversation you should know the biggest problem, the likely next step, and whether a project makes business sense.
Dark system-console look for AI/automation offers.
Useful for AI, automation, monitoring, and technical transformation pages.
Logo, links, language switch, consultation action.
Pill-like groups for small static sites.
Minimal text-first navigation for classic pages.
Compact trust band for partner logos or certification marks.
Three outcome metrics with short context.
ROI-first decision cards for consulting offers.
Check if it makes sense.
Technology is the means.
You know what to do next.
Mixed-size cards for services and outcomes.
Stop losing opportunities between calls, emails, and notes.
Collect context and handle repeatable stages.
Detect problems before customers do.
Readable three-column service cards.
Remove manual work.
Guide the buying decision.
Make work repeatable.
Cards framed around pain points instead of services.
No owner, no follow-up, no visibility.
Every step depends on memory and manual checks.
Text-only cards with strong hierarchy.
Name the problem.
Check the cost of doing nothing.
Build the smallest useful system.
Cards with colored rails for service categories.
Pipeline, owners, reminders.
Context, triage, support.
Pages that answer real questions.
Talk, analyze, decide.
Understand goals and constraints.
Find the first valuable fix.
Choose the next move.
Horizontal/vertical responsive timeline.
Something feels too hard.
Problem gets named.
Smallest sensible project.
Measured implementation.
Problem to ROI to implementation flow.
Operational workflow shown as columns.
Lead flow
Manual checks
CRM owners
Alerts
Measured change
Wide consultation strip with primary/phone CTAs.
No package pitch. First, a useful diagnosis.
Low-noise CTA for readable pages.
Dark CTA band for strong transitions.
Mobile-safe sticky action pattern.
Mobile sticky CTA should be short, single action, and hide near footer.
Free consultationTwo testimonial cards.
They helped us see the real bottleneck before we spent money.
The first useful thing was clarity, not code.
Before/after comparison.
Leads hidden in email and memory.
Every lead has owner, status, and next action.
Three compact result stories.
Follow-up stabilized.
Incidents caught earlier.
Offer became easier to understand.
Objection handling proof tiles.
If it does not make sense, say no.
Start where ROI is clearest.
Every process has a next action.
Three offer levels without fake pricing.
Find the problem.
Implement the useful system.
Monitor and improve.
Comparison matrix for services.
| Area | Goal | Proof |
|---|---|---|
| CRM | Less lost leads | Owner + status |
| AI | Less repetitive work | Handled steps |
Who this is for and not for.
You want a business result, not just a tool.
You only want a trendy system with no owner.
Static form layout for future wiring.
Accessible details/summary FAQ.
No. Knowing the pain is enough for the first call.
No. It should produce a clear decision either way.
Static article/blog teaser grid.
Standard footer with trust and legal links.
Small footer for simple landing pages.
Footer with sitemap and contact blocks.